|
||||||||||
| PREV NEXT | FRAMES NO FRAMES | |||||||||
| Packages that use OntologyConfig | |
|---|---|
| phenote.config | |
| phenote.datamodel | |
| Uses of OntologyConfig in phenote.config |
|---|
| Methods in phenote.config that return OntologyConfig | |
|---|---|
(package private) OntologyConfig |
FieldConfig.getOntConfig(java.lang.String name)
return OC with name - null if none |
(package private) static OntologyConfig |
OntologyConfig.makePostCompRelCfg(java.lang.String file,
FieldConfig fc)
|
| Methods in phenote.config that return types with arguments of type OntologyConfig | |
|---|---|
java.util.List<OntologyConfig> |
Config.getAllOntologyConfigs()
|
java.util.List<OntologyConfig> |
FieldConfig.getOntologyConfigList()
|
| Methods in phenote.config with parameters of type OntologyConfig | |
|---|---|
(package private) void |
FieldConfig.addOntologyConfig(OntologyConfig o)
|
void |
Config.addOntologyConfig(OntologyConfig oc)
|
(package private) int |
FieldConfig.getOntCfgIndex(OntologyConfig oc)
|
(package private) boolean |
FieldConfig.hasOntConfig(OntologyConfig oc)
|
(package private) void |
FieldConfig.insertOntologyConfig(int index,
OntologyConfig o)
|
| Method parameters in phenote.config with type arguments of type OntologyConfig | |
|---|---|
void |
Config.setAllOntologyConfigs(java.util.List<OntologyConfig> oc)
|
(package private) void |
FieldConfig.setOntologyConfigList(java.util.List<OntologyConfig> configs)
|
| Uses of OntologyConfig in phenote.datamodel |
|---|
| Methods in phenote.datamodel that return OntologyConfig | |
|---|---|
OntologyConfig |
Ontology.getOntologyConfig()
|
| Constructors in phenote.datamodel with parameters of type OntologyConfig | |
|---|---|
Ontology(java.util.Collection<org.obo.datamodel.Namespace> spaces,
OntologyConfig oc,
org.obo.datamodel.OBOSession os)
is it funny to pass in a config object to datamodel - given that config dictates the model i actually think its ok |
|
|
||||||||||
| PREV NEXT | FRAMES NO FRAMES | |||||||||